Sunday 19 July 2015

Conservative wins mayoral election in Argentina's capital

 

 

 
 

FILE - In this July 5, 2015 file photo, Buenos Aires Mayor Chief of Staff who is running for mayor, Horacio Rodriguez Larreta, right, stands before supporters with Buenos Aires Mayor and presidential candidate Mauricio Macri as they celebrate the results of mayoral elections in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Although Larreta won the mayoral election, Buenos Aires is holding a July 19 runoff between Larreta and his rival Martin Lousteau from the ECO 

coalition. (AP Photo/Daniel Jayo, File)







BUENOS AIRES, Argentina (AP) — Conservative Horacio Rodriguez Larreta won Sunday's mayoral run-off election in Buenos Aires, in a closer race than his opposition party had hoped for in the capital ahead of presidential voting later this year.
With 99.9 percent of ballots counted, the candidate of the business-friendly PRO Party had 51.6 percent of the votes. His rival, ECO Party candidate and former economy minister Martin Lousteau, got 48.4 percent.
Rodriguez Larreta is an economist and was chief of staff for outgoing mayor and likely presidential candidate Mauricio Macri. Rodriguez Larreta won the most votes in the opening round of balloting July 5, but did not garner enough votes to avoid a run-off with Lousteau.
In his victory speech, Rodriguez Larreta thanked Macri for his work as mayor and vowed to continue improving public education, health and security for Argentina's capital city.
"I'm optimistic about the future because with Mauricio (Macri) as president, Argentina will recover its path of growth and well-being for all. And that will benefit all of the citizens of Buenos Aires as well," he said.
With Buenos Aires' 2.5 million voters accounting for nearly 8 percent of Argentina's voting population, the capital city's election was being closely watched for tendencies for the Aug. 9 presidential primaries and the Oct. 25 national election.
Both Rodriguez Larreta and Lousteau are critical of President Cristina Fernandez's leftist government. The candidate representing Fernandez's Victory Front coalition, Mariano Recalde, was knocked out of the race after finishing third in the first round July 5.
Rodriguez Larreta has said he hopes to help achieve change for all of Argentina after the 12-year rule of Fernandez and her late husband and predecessor as president, Nestor Kirchner.
The PRO had been hoping for a stronger margin in the mayor's contest to give a boost for Macri's chances in the presidential race. His main rival is Buenos Aires Gov. Daniel Scioli, who has been picked by Fernandez to continue the populist policies that began with her husband's presidency. Fernandez is barred from seeking a third consecutive term.
Restoring Argentina's sense of pride and sovereignty after the country's worst economic crisis in 2001 has been the central goal of Fernandez and Kirchner. The presidential couple negotiated or paid off most of Argentina's defaulted debt, nationalized the pension system, kept energy cheap through subsidies and dug deep into the treasury to redirect revenue to the poor through handouts.
But many Argentines are calling for change amid frustration with one of the world's highest inflation rates, government currency and trade controls and corruption accusations that have penetrated deep into Fernandez's inner circle



Read more about this here.

Tuesday 14 July 2015

Introduction of ´´Peor es nada´´ and course of english for emigrating men: ``Juan Perez is a chicken thief ´´


The best critical and smart humor of the nineties .
 
No subtitles, I'm very sorry.

Argentinean police contaminated evidence at dead prosecutor’s home

Video shows authorities wiping clean the gun Alberto Nisman reportedly used to kill himself.

Caso Nisman
An image from the police video recorded at Nisman's home. / El trecetv

A police video released to the public on Sunday night shows how investigators may have tampered with evidence at the scene of Argentinean federal prosecutor Alberto Nisman’s death, the details of which continue to remain an enigma for many nearly five months later.
TV journalist Jorge Lanata broadcast the unedited police video taken at the crime scene on his popular news program Periodismo para todos (Journalism for everyone). The recording demonstrates how a series of investigative errors were committed by authorities when they arrived at the prosecutor’s apartment on January 18.
The video shows a series of errors committed by officials when they arrived at the prosecutor’s home
The broadcast has only fueled more speculation over the mysterious death of 51-year-old Nisman, who was found with a gunshot wound to his head on his bathroom floor the day before he was scheduled to testify before Congress over cover-up charges he had recently filed against President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner.
After a string of appeals, the Federal Criminal Cassation Court last month decided to dismiss Nisman’s original complaint against the president and other government officials whom he accused of covering up an attack on the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires in 1994, which left 85 people dead.
Lanata said he had the entire four-hour video in his possession but only showed parts of the recording that police took at Nisman’s Le Parc Tower apartment in Buenos Aires’ Puerto Madero neighborhood.
According to Lanata, authorities on the scene apparently ruined a good part of the investigation in they way they handled the evidence, including searching for DNA samples. For example, one extract shows the cartridge clip of the gun to be completely clean, but the firearm itself stained with blood.
One part shows the gun’s cartridge clip to be completely clean, but the firearm itself stained with blood
This reportedly prevented forensic experts from lifting fingerprints from the gun, which may have belonged to people other than Nisman, experts on the show said. Forensic investigators did not even find DNA evidence linking the firearm to Diego Lagomarsino, a computer expert and friend of Nisman, who has admitted giving him the gun for his own protection the day before the prosecutor’s body was found.
And while the clip was clean when authorities arrived, one investigator is seen handling and staining it with blood from his rubber gloves. He is also shown picking up bullet shells and putting them in the bidet, further altering the original crime scene.
Nisman’s former wife, Sandra Arroyo, who is a judge, has maintained that her ex-husband did not commit suicide but was murdered in his own apartment.
No official ruling has been made in Nisman’s death but an investigating prosecutor, Viviana Fein, has said that so far all the evidence points to suicide.
But many, like Arroyo, remain unconvinced.
Nisman cut short his vacation in Spain in mid-January to file cover-up charges against Fernández de Kirchner, Foreign Minister Héctor Timerman, and other officials for allegedly trying to derail his investigation into the 1994 terrorist bombing.
He had claimed that the president was trying to seek a grain-for-oil deal with Iran and in exchange she had agreed to drop charges against high-level Iranian officials charged with complicity in the attack.
The government has repeatedly denied this allegation, and Nisman’s reputation has come under question from many sectors.
Prosecutor Fein can be seen leading the investigation throughout the video, and the voice of Sergio Berni, the president’s chief of state security – whose arrival at the scene before the forensic team has also evoked a whirlwind of speculation – can also occasionally be heard in the background. At one point, he tells Fein to go to the bathroom because Nisman may be suffering when in fact the prosecutor had been dead for at least 12 hours.
Authorities are also seen wiping the bloody firearm with toilet paper. This is followed by a sudden cutoff in the recording – which should not have occurred – when images may have shown exactly how investigators cleaned the weapon.
The bathroom is shown to be full of investigators stepping on blood, including Fein, who may have added her own prints at the scene.
One official can be heard telling her: “Watch out where you are stepping.”
“I have never had any doubt that Nisman was murdered,” said Lanata on his show. “But we may perhaps never know this because the crime scene was tampered with.”
 
 
 
 
 

For more information you can click here.

Thursday 2 July 2015

The forgotten Holocaust: The Armenian massacre that inspired Hitler

 

 

When the Turkish gendarmes came for Mugrditch Nazarian, they did not give him time to dress, but took him from his home in the dead of night in his pyjamas.
The year was 1915, and his wife, Varter, knew that she was unlikely to see her husband alive again. Armenian men like him were being rounded up and taken away. In the words of their persecutors, they were being "deported" - but not to an earthly place.

Varter never found out what fate her husband suffered. Some said he was shot, others that he was among the men held in jail, who suffered torture so unbearable that they poured the kerosene from prison lamps over their heads and turned themselves into human pyres as a release from the agony.

Heavily pregnant, Varter was ordered to join a death convoy marching women and children to desert concentration camps.
Scroll down for more ...
armenian massacre


She survived the journey alone - her six children died along the way. The two youngest were thrown to their deaths down a mountainside by Turkish guards; the other four starved to death at the bottom of a well where they had hidden to escape.

Varter herself was abducted by a man who promised to save her - but raped her instead. Eventually, she was released to mourn her lost family, the victims of Europe's forgotten holocaust.

The killing of 1.5m Armenians by the Ottoman Turks during World War I remains one of the bloodiest and most contentious events of the 20th century, and has been called the first modern genocide.

In all, 25 concentration camps were set up in a systematic slaughter aimed at eradicating the Armenian people - classed as "vermin" by the Turks.

Winston Churchill described the massacres as an "administrative holocaust" and noted: "This crime was planned and executed for political reasons. The opportunity presented itself for clearing Turkish soil of a Christian race."

Chillingly, Adolf Hitler used the episode to justify the Nazi murder of six million Jews, saying in 1939: "Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?"


Yet, carried out under the cover of war, the Armenian genocide remains shrouded in mystery - not least because modern-day Turkey refuses to acknowledge the existence of its killing fields.

Now, new photographs of the horror have come to light. They come from the archives of the German Deutsche Bank, which was working in the region financing a railway network when the killing began.

Unearthed by award-winning war correspondent Robert Fisk, they were taken by employees of the bank to document the terror unfolding before them.

They show young men, crammed into cattle trucks, waiting to travel to their deaths. The Turks crowded 90 starving and terrified Armenians into each wagon, the same number the Nazis averaged in their transports to the death camps of Eastern Europe during the Jewish Holocaust.

Behind each grainy image lies a human tragedy. Destitute women and children stare past the camera, witness to untold savagery.

Almost all young women were raped according to Fisk, while older women were beaten to death - they did not merit the expense of a bullet. Babies were left by the side of the road to die.

Often, attractive young Armenian girls were sent to Turkish harems, where some lived in enforced prostitution until the mid-1920s.

Many other archive photographs testify to the sheer brutality suffered by the Armenians: children whose knee tendons were severed, a young woman who starved to death beside her two small children, and a Turkish official taunting starving Armenian children with a loaf of bread.

Eyewitness accounts are even more graphic. Foreign diplomats posted in the Ottoman Empire at the time told of the atrocities, but were powerless to act.

One described the concentration camps, saying: "As on the gates of Dante's Hell, the following should be written at the entrance of these accursed encampments: 'You who enter, leave all hopes.'"


So how exactly did the events of 1915-17 unfold? Just as Hitler wanted a Nazi-dominated world that would be Judenrein - cleansed of its Jews - so in 1914 the Ottoman Empire wanted to construct a Muslim empire that would stretch from Istanbul to Manchuria.
Armenia, an ancient Christian civilisation spreading out from the eastern end of the Black Sea, stood in its way.


At the turn of the 20th century, there were two million Christian Armenians living in the Ottoman Empire. Already, 200,000 had been killed in a series of pogroms - most of them brutally between 1894 and 1896.


In November 1914, the Ottoman Empire entered World War I against the Allies and launched a disastrous military campaign against Russian forces in the Caucasus. It blamed defeat on the Armenians, claiming they had colluded with the Russians.

A prominent Turkish writer at the time described the war as "the awaited day" when the Turks would exact "revenge, the horrors of which have not yet been recorded in history".

Through the final months of 1914, the Ottoman government put together a number of "Special Organisation" units, armed gangs consisting of thousands of convicts specifically released from prison for the purpose.

These killing squads of murderers and thieves were to perpetrate the greatest crimes in the genocide. They were the first state bureaucracy to implement mass killings for the purpose of race extermination. One army commander described them at the time as the "butchers of the human species".

On the night of April 24, 1915 - the anniversary of which is marked by Armenians around the world - the Ottoman government moved decisively, arresting 250 Armenian intellectuals. This was followed by the arrest of a further 2,000.
Scroll down for more ...
armenian massacre


Some died from torture in custody, while many were executed in public places. The resistance poet, Daniel Varoujan, was found disembowelled, with his eyes gouged out.

One university professor was made to watch his colleagues have their fingernails and toenails pulled
out, before being blinded. He eventually lost his mind, and was let loose naked into the streets.

There were reports of crucifixions, at which the Turks would torment their victims: "Now let your Christ come and help you!"

Johannes Lepsius, a German pastor who tried to protect the Armenians, said: "The armed gangs saw their main task as raiding and looting Armenian villages. If the men escaped their grasp, they would rape the women."

So began a carefully orchestrated campaign to eradicate the Armenians. Throughout this period, Ottoman leaders deceived the world, orchestrating the slaughter using code words in official telegrams.

At later war crimes trials, several military officers testified that the word "deportation" was used to mean "massacre" or "annihilation".

Between May and August 1915, the Armenian population of the eastern provinces was deported and murdered en masse.

The American ambassador to the Ottoman Empire, Henry Morgenthau, said: "Squads of 50 or 100 men would be taken, bound together in groups of four, and marched to a secluded spot.

"Suddenly the sound of rifle shots would fill the air. Those sent to bury the bodies would find them almost invariably stark naked, for, as usual, the Turks had stolen all their clothes."

In urban areas, a town crier was used to deliver the deportation order, and the entire male population would be taken outside the city limits and killed - "slaughtered like sheep".

Women and children would then be executed, deported to concentration camps or simply turned out into the deserts and left to starve to death.

An American diplomat described the deportations or death marches: "A massacre, however horrible the word may sound, would be humane in comparison with it."

An eyewitness who came upon a convoy of deportees reported that the women implored him: "Save us! We will become Muslims! We will become Germans! We will become anything you want, just save us! They are going to cut our throats!"

Walking skeletons begged for food, and women threw their babies into lakes rather than hand them over to the Turks.

There was mass looting and pillaging of Armenian goods. It is reported that civilians burned bodies to find the gold coins the Armenians swallowed for safekeeping.

Conditions in the concentration camps were appalling. The majority were located near the modern Iraqi and Syrian frontiers, in the desert between Jerablus and Deir ez-Zor - described as "the epicentre of death". Up to 70,000 Armenians were herded into each camp, where dysentery and typhus were rife.

There, they were left to starve or die of thirst in the burning sun, with no shelter. In some cases, the living were forced to eat the dead. Few survived.

In four days alone, from 10-14 June 1915, the gangs 'eliminated' some 25,000 people in the Kemah Erzincan area alone.

In September 1915, the American consul in Kharput, Leslie A. Davis, reported discovering the bodies of nearly 10,000 Armenians dumped into several ravines near beautiful Lake Goeljuk, calling it the "slaughterhouse province".


Tales of atrocity abound. Historians report that the killing squads dashed infants on rocks in front of their mothers.

One young boy remembered his grandfather, the village priest, kneeling down to pray for mercy before the Turks. Soldiers beheaded him, and played football with the old man's decapitated head before his devastated family.

At the horrific Ras-ul-Ain camp near Urfa, two German railway engineers reported seeing three to four hundred women arrive in one day, completely naked. One witness told how Sergeant Nuri, the overseer of the camp, bragged about raping children.

An American, Mrs Anna Harlowe Birge, who was travelling from Smyrna to Constantinople, wrote in November 1915: "At every station where we stopped, we came side by side with one of these trains. It was made up of cattle trucks, and the faces of little children were looking out from behind the tiny barred windows of each truck."

In her memoir, Ravished Armenia, Aurora Mardiganian described being raped and thrown into a harem. From a wealthy banking family, she was just one of thousands of Armenian girls to suffer a similar fate. Many were eventually killed and discarded.

In the city of Malatia, she saw 16 girls crucified, vultures eating their corpses. "Each girl had been nailed alive upon her cross, spikes through her feet and hands," Mardiganian wrote. "Only their hair blown by the wind covered their bodies."

In another town, she reports that the killing squads played "the game of swords" with young Armenian girls, planting their weapons in the ground and throwing their victims onto the protruding blade in sport.

Elsewhere, bodies tied to each other drifted down the Euphrates. And in the Black Sea region, the Armenians were herded onto boats and then thrown overboard.

In the desert regions, the Turks set up primitive gas chambers, stuffing Armenians into caves and asphyxiating them with brush fires.

Everywhere, there were Armenian corpses: in lakes and rivers, in empty desert cisterns and village wells. Travellers reported that the stench of death pervaded the landscape.

One Turkish gendarme told a Norwegian nurse serving in Erzincan that he had accompanied a convoy of 3,000 people. Some were summarily executed in groups along the way; those too sick or exhausted to march were killed where they fell. He concluded: "They're all gone, finished."

By 1917, the Armenian 'problem', as it was described by Ottoman leaders, had been thoroughly "resolved". Muslim families were brought in to occupy empty villages.

Even after the war, the Ottoman ministers were not repentant. In 1920, they praised those responsible for the genocide, saying: "These things were done to secure the future of our homeland, which we know is greater and holier than even our own lives."

The British government pushed for those responsible for the killing to be punished, and in 1919 a war crimes tribunal was set up.

The use of the word "genocide" in describing the massacre of Armenians has been hotly contested by Turkey. Ahead of the nation's accession to the EU, it is even more politically inflammatory.

The official Turkish position remains that 600,000 or so Armenians died as a result of war. They deny any state intention to wipe out Armenians and the killings remain taboo in the country, where it is illegal to use the term genocide to describe the events of those bloody years.

Internationally, 21 countries have recognised the killings as genocide under the UN 1948 definition. Armenian campaigners believe Turkey should be denied EU membership until it admits responsibility for the massacres.

Just as in the Nazi Holocaust, there were many tales of individual acts of great courage by Armenians and Turks alike.

Haji Halil, a Muslim Turk, kept eight members of his mother's Armenian family safely hidden in his home, risking death.

In some areas, groups of Kurds followed the deportation convoys and saved as many people as they could. Many mothers gave their children to Turkish and Kurdish families to save them from death.

The Governor-General of Aleppo stood up to Ottoman officials and tried to prevent deportations from his region, but failed.

He later recalled: "I was like a man standing by a river without any means of rescue. But instead of water, the river flowed with blood and thousands of innocent children, blameless old men, helpless women and strong young people all on their way to destruction.

"Those I could seize with my hands I saved. The others, I assume, floated downstream, never to return."


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-479143/The-forgotten-Holocaust-The-Armenian-massacre-inspired-Hitler.html#ixzz3en8FtQSv